Solent Home | SEA Home | About | Policies

Solent University Logo

Solent Electronic Archive
SEA HOMEPAGE Back to SEA homepage

SOLENT ELECTRONIC ARCHIVE

  • Home
  • About
  • Policies
  • Latest Additions
  • Search
  • Browse by Year
  • Browse by Subject
  • Browse by Faculty
  • Browse by Creator

USER MENU

Login

Auditory hindsight bias: Fluency misattribution versus memory reconstruction

Higham, Philip A. and Neil, Greg J. and Bernstein, Daniel M.. (2017). Auditory hindsight bias: Fluency misattribution versus memory reconstruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2017, 43 (6), pp. 1144-1159

[img] Microsoft Word
Auditory_Hindsight_Bias_R2.docx - Submitted Version

Download (611kB)

Abstract

We report 4 experiments investigating auditory hindsight bias – the tendency to overestimate the intelligibility of distorted auditory stimuli after learning their identity. An associative priming manipulation was used to vary the amount of processing fluency independently of prior target knowledge. For hypothetical designs, in which hindsight judgments are made for peers in foresight, we predicted that judgments would be based on processing fluency and that hindsight bias would be greater in the unrelated- compared to related-prime context (differential-fluency hypothesis). Conversely, for memory designs, in which foresight judgments are remembered in hindsight, we predicted that judgments would be based on memory reconstruction and that there would be independent effects of prime relatedness and prior target knowledge (recollection hypothesis). These predictions were confirmed. Specifically, we found support for the differential-fluency hypothesis when a hypothetical design was used in Experiments 1 and 2 (hypothetical group). Conversely, when a memory design was used in Experiments 2 (memory group), 3A and 3B, we found support for the recollection hypothesis. Together, the results suggest that qualitatively different mechanisms create hindsight bias in the two designs. The results are discussed in terms of fluency misattributions, memory reconstruction, anchoring-and-adjustment, sense making, and a multi-component model of hindsight bias.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: SOCIAL SCIENCE > Psychology
Faculties: Faculty of Business Sport & Enterprise > Faculty of Business Sport & Enterprise (Other)
Depositing User: Greg Neil
Date Deposited: 07 Apr 2017 08:43
Last Modified: 03 Jul 2019 09:59
URI: https://ssudl.solent.ac.uk/id/eprint/3536

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Disclaimer | Privacy policy © Solent University

Main switchboard tel: 023 8201 3000